Matters
discussed here are all part of the historical record. Those who have
not studied the history of WW#2 may find them spoilers. This is not
the first history of WW#2 but it does have the advantage of using
records recently declassified.
First
comment from a Canadian, of course, is to highlight the fact that
this History of WW#2 is written from an American point of view. The
Yanks maintained their isolationist stance until December 7, 1941
when the Japs bombed Pearl Harbour at which point it took another two
years for them to ramp up their efforts and make any significant
contribution to the war effort. Therefore the Liberation Trilogy of
which this is book 3 begins in 1943, four years into the war. What
the rest of us were doing until that point hardly seems to matter.
Three
things stand out over and over again:
Military
Intelligence. Planning depends on it and the best laid plans can fall
apart when the unexpected happens and in war it usually does.
Fraticide.
Before GPS finding a precise location from the air, by sea, and even
on land was a tenuous process. Bombs were dropped on allied
positions. Airborne troops were dropped over open ocean or miles from
their intended drop zones. Fire missions hit wrong targets. Troops
got lost or advanced into friendly fire and were landed by boat on
the wrong beachhead.
Transport.
An army marches on its belly. Landing troops is one thing. Keeping
them fed and in ammunition quite another; motorized equipment cannot
run without fuel. Air fields and ports become critical for materiel
transport. Battles were won or lost by Quartermasters. Soldiers can't
fight once they run out of bullets.
Of
concern to the supreme commander, Eisenhower, was the need to mollify
the egos of the generals who held command of the armies of the
various combatants: Britain, France, Canada, and the US. Each wanted
their opportunity to win glory and felt slighted when deprived.
The
author continues to give historical background to the locations where
engagements occur and to introduce new personalities as they appear.
Attention is paid to both the Allied forces and the German
leadership.
With
the liberation of Paris High Command and Logistics move there. High
Command balloons to 24,000 staff. With that many they could well have
transported Gerry Cans of fuel across Europe by bucket brigade. To
keep equipment fueled it took 1.5 gallons of aviation fuel to fly 1
gallon of truck or tank fuel. Supplies involved 800,000 separate
items ordered from half way round the world for troops ever on the
move that took up to 4 months to arrive. Imagine keeping several
million men fed and in toilet paper. Americans are noted for prodigal
wastage, they lost their guns, their ammo, their grenade launchers at
ridiculous rates. Tires were shredded on tossed ration cans. Not only
did they bomb Europe, they trashed it as well.
After
Monty's Market Garden design fails he continues to be an exasperating
egotistical little peacock planning pushes into Germany while
neglecting to clear the approaches to Atwerp. While troops are forced
to stand fast for lack of supplies ships lay anchored offshore for
lack of berths to unload and supplies lay waiting in America for lack
of transport. Meanwhile Monty fumes that sufficient resources are not
being allocated to his schemes. Attacking Germany is sexier than
clearing ports so his troops can have supplies.
Given
Hitler's decrees that German soil be defended to the last man to the
last bullet cities such as Aachen were pulverized building by
building right down to their basement foundations.
In
Band of Brothers a general is quoted as saying: “Flies spread
disease, keep yours closed.” Venereal Disease is one of the dirty
little secrets of war. The lack of proper clothing, malnutrition,
and the spread of disease among men in close quarters lacking clean
water and proper sanitation created more casualties than the actual
fighting. Maladies of neglect such as trench foot invalided hundreds
of thousands. None of this touches the psychological affects of
endless warfare.
My
pacifist leanings will become apparent. When the state sanctions the
killing of their own citizens they call it capital punishment. When
the state sanctions the mass-murder of the citizens of another
country they call it war. Whatever jingoistic terms are used to
pretty it up soldiers kill other human beings. Once that taboo is
broken putting limits on the means used to do it seems specious.
Until the American Civil War soldiers lined up on the battlefield and
shot at one another. When labelling another the enemy makes killing
him legitimate how do you define atrocity? Can there be gentleman's
agreements as to the limits of barbarism.
Canadian
Documentary Film Makers named McKenna were vilified by Veterans for
portraying the Canadian War Effort in less than glowing lights. This
author describes Bomber Harris and his bombing of German Civilian
Targets in similar fashion. Some people seem to get a charge out of
killing their fellow creatures. Military training instills that
killer instinct for the murder of their fellow human beings. What the
military has yet to deal with is deprogramming for a return to
civilian life. How do you turn that off?
Power
corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The decisions
generals make gets their own men killed as well as the enemy. When
generals make bad decisions their own men die needlessly and/or
without accomplishing any useful objective. The exercise of that kind
of power requires a certain amount of ego, some are better at keeping
their egos in check than others.
In
the end the Allies won the war because the Germans ran out of cannon
fodder first. Wars are lost not won and in a war of attrition the
loser is he who runs out of men and materiel first. This history
makes it plain that this war was not lost because the Allies
possessed such superior military skills. One of its strengths is the
fact that it makes no effort to hide the blunders made by both sides.
One
such blunder is known to history as the Battle of the Bulge. Allied
intelligence believed that only a madman would initiate an all-out
offensive in December 1944 but they discounted the fact that the
orders were given by Hitler, not his generals. When their leaders
make mistakes, soldiers die.
As
portrayed Monty was an egomaniac who refused to follow orders and
kept insisting that he be put in charge of all troops in the European
Theatre. Problem being that this was Ike's job and the Generals in
his fellow Allied Countries found Monty impossible to work with and
assumed an either he or I stance. Once more Monty dithered and failed
to act in time prevent German Troops from retreating when the “Bulge”
failed them. His public statements antagonized British Allies. The
writer is an American. It would be interesting to see how a British
Historian would interpret the same set of facts. It is also obvious
that the subject of this “History” is dead. To
quote Churchill: “There is only one thing worse than fighting with
allies, and that is fighting without them.” Lovers quarrels are
part of Love.
The
final sections of this book dealing with the discovery of the
Concentration Camps is not reading for the faint of heart. Reading
these books will have you reaching for your dictionary more than
once. New words were coined to describe this war and new meanings
given to old ones. The author uses some rather arcane language at
times.
No comments:
Post a Comment